The philosophy of knowledge and science
The nature of knowledge, what is real knowledge, what is false, how do you achieve it, how do we know that we know, …
Something whose outcome is not well defined and clear
Example: Weather, quantum states, …
It is easy to give an answer in certainty, but it’s not so easy to do it in an uncertain situation.
→ back to 2.)
In computer science
Example: feedback loops, back-propagation in machine learning, try-catch
Loops are not for free, they need money, power, energy, time. At some time you need to stop.
Looping is not always the way.
Example: If you continue to loop to improve the candle, you will never discover lightbulb
Autopilot is the action of doing an activity that requires the minimum amount of energy to be completed. It is often a “no”-answer because it is easier to deny something instead of thinking about the request and its feasibility. But doing so, you are limiting potentially good actions.
We take and uncertain request to a safe certain response.
Autopilot is riskless and stable but it will always search for the local optimum but you will probably not reach the global one.
Sometimes the autopilot is good, one cannot put effort into every very decision because they will be overwhelmed. But sometimes we need to take control and overriding the autopilot.
When to override?
Example: When there is a problem, emergency situation, training (forcing to push yourself forward), opportunity that do not lie in a usual scenario, something big to do, in case of procastination
Situations in which you are supposed to be in manual-control but suddenly you switch to autopilot.
Example: When you are studying but you get distracted by the surroundings, when you are driving late at night and your body decides to sleep even if you don’t want to
Autopilot blocks you to do an action that will improve your situation
If you add parameters, the complexity grows exponentially and you may decide to fallback to an autopilot choice
Example When buying stuff you fallback to a brand that you used in the past, or you may take the decision only based on the price removing other useful parameters, or just buy randomly, or even not buy anything
Is dating a rational or emotional process?
Autopilot 🤖: you know by instinct
Manual pilot 🤔: you need to sit down and think
Direct 📌: It is directly noticeable
Proxy 📡: you have to guess it based on the context
|Parameter||Auto / Manual||Direct / Proxy||Labels|
But if you think about online dating, often the Direct become a Proxy
Example: Age is Direct in real life but become a Proxy online
Usually, uncertainty decreases over time in the real world, instead, in an online space the uncertainty fluctuates and is really slow to change compared to physical space.
The context adds some autopilot: the way you interact, the fact that both of the people are actively searching for a partner in an online dating app, the context decides the type of information you can or cannot expose, ….
You apply bounded rationality in something that is intrinsically uncertain.
A huge disconnection between how you think things should work and how the people that designed the system are making them work.
Transferring human activities into business/economic activities
Philosophical theories applied in other industries and contexts.
We are applying notions in other fields of life.
We are opening new spaces and creating problems for other spaces.
We need to take seriously the topics about the uncertainty that we discuss in order to position ourselves much better in the world.
When creating something you need to be aware of what you are including in the system to avoid to build a bomb while trying to innovate.